Initializing...
Home
  • Home
  • Performance Analysis
    • Introduction
    • Features
    • Advantages
    • References
    • Gallery
    • Downloads
    • Installation
    • Buy
    • More...
  • Exercise Machines
    • Introduction
    • Features
    • Advantages
    • Exercises
    • References
    • Gallery
    • Buy
    • More...
  • Products
    • Downloads
    • Manuals
    • Price List
    • APAS 2020 - Standard Edition
    • APAS 2020 - Premium Edition
    • APAS 2020 - A/D Workstation
    • ACES 2020 - Multifunction Machine
    • ACES 2020 - Arm/Leg Machine
  • Library
    • Applications
    • Archives
    • Articles
    • Documentation
    • Downloads
    • Journals
    • Manuals
    • Presentations
    • Tutorials
    • Videos
    • More...
  • Company
    • About
    • Activities
    • Contact
    • Founder
    • History
    • Presentations
    • More...
  • Personal
    • Books
    • Wikipedia
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
      • Dream Factory
      • Personal
    • Flickr
      • Recent Additions
      • All Collections
      • All Albums
      • Tags
    • Photo Galleries
      • Recent Additions
      • Locations
      • Rated 5 Stars
      • Rated 4 Stars
      • Rated 3 Stars
    • Administration
    • More...
  • External links
    • Ariel Astro
    • More information
  • 70

    Computerized Exercise System

    Ariel Dynamics is proud to introduce the new generation of the revolutionary ACES (Ariel Computerized Exercise System), the most unique system and advanced exercise technology on the market today.
  • 69

    Performance Analysis System

    The Ariel Performance Analysis System (APAS) is a video-based 3D motion analysis system. APAS can capture video from multiple cameras simultaneously and perform a biomechanical analysis automatically.
  • 73

    Articles & Scientific Publications

    Ariel Dynamics and Dr. Gideon Ariel have been covered extensively in newspapers and magazines. We also published some of our scientific articles and system brochures. Enjoy!
  • 71

    Online Reference Library

    We helped athletes become world champions. We can help you improve your game too! Check the Ariel Library for more information.
  • 72

    Download our Applications

    All our Performance Analysis Applications can be downloaded from our website and evaluated free of charge. Our applications run on Microsoft Windows.
  • 74

    History of Biomechanics

    We are part of the history of modern biomechanics. Check out some of the media coverage over the years on ABC, CBS, CNN, ESPN, National Geographic, NBC and more. Shows are hosted by David Letterman, Tom Brokaw, and many others...

Online.

Sample PDA

Page
Published on Saturday, October 4, 1997 by Gideon Ariel
  • General Information
  • Case History
  • Job Information
  • Kinematic Neck Assessment
  • Kinematic Shoulder Assessment
  • Kinematic Elbow Assessment
  • Kinematic Wrist Assessment
  • Kinematic Finger Assessment
  • Thumb Flexion/Extension
  • Conclusions and Recommendations

Table of Contents

1. General Information

More information...
Examinee
Name:
Address:
City, State, ZIP:
Social Security Number:
Employer:
Occupation:
Current Evaluation
Date of Evaluation:
Evaluated by:
Site of Evaluation: Site 1: Kinematic Consultants
Comments:
Referral Source:
Insurance Administrator:
Case Number:
Claim Number:
Picture 1: The Examinee

2. Case History

More information...
Physician:
Diagnosis:
Date of Incident (Injury):
Complaints:
Height:
Weight:
Type of incident:
Required assistance:
Continued to work:
Initially evaluated
By:
Test and Tx:
Result:
Specialty Referral 1
By:
Test and Tx:
Result:
Specialty Referral 2
By:
Test and Tx:
Result:
Surgery 1
Date:
By:
Type:
Surgery 2
Date:
By:
Type:
Surgery 3
Date:
By:
Type:
Return to work:
Status: [Select status]
Comments:

3. Job Information

This data is usually obtained from the referring case manager or directly from the Examinee's employer. If no job description is available a description is obtained from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT).

More information...
Job Description:
Provided by:
DOT Number:
Work Level Category - DOT: Sedentary
Work Level Category - Employer: Sedentary

4. Kinematic Neck Assessment

A computer kinematic assessment is performed for cervical flexion/extension, lateral flexion and rotation. The Examinee is asked to perform each maneuver 8-10 repetitions to full range and as quickly as possible. The events are video taped in a precisely calibrated field for computer analysis. Each event is analyzed for total dynamic range of motion and peak velocity quantity and quality. Consistency of results is considered for determining Examinee effort. After a thorough discussion of expectations, and agreement of understanding by the Examinee, the Examinee is asked to perform the movement events.

More information...
Picture 2: Cervical Flexion
Picture 3: Cervical Extension
Chart 1: Cervical Flexion/Extension
Table 1: Cervical Flexion/Extension [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
Flexion Extension
Norm (mean) 45 -45
Examinee Sample (mean) 21.5 -43.9
Standard Deviation (sd) 3.06 3.23
Range of Motion (rom) 65.4 65.4
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 4.7% 4.9%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 8 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Accept
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.17026
Level of Confidence 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Reject Accept
Probability (p1) 0.00000 0.00000
Picture 4: Cervical Lateral Flexion - Left
Picture 5: Cervical Lateral Flexion - Right
Chart 2: Cervical Lateral Flexion
Table 2: Cervical Lateral Flexion [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
Left Right
Norm (mean) 45 -45
Examinee Sample (mean) 32.9 -32.1
Standard Deviation (sd) 2.41 6.12
Range of Motion (rom) 65 65
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 3.7% 9.4%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 8 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00011
Level of Confidence 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept
Probability (p1) 0.35569 0.35569
Picture 6: Cervical Rotation - Left
Picture 7: Cervical Rotation - Right
Chart 3: Cervical Rotation
Table 3: Cervical Rotation [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
Left Right
Norm (mean) 60 -60
Examinee Sample (mean) 32.9 -29.5
Standard Deviation (sd) 2.51 1.79
Range of Motion (rom) 62.3 62.3
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 4% 2.9%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 9 10
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00100 0.00100
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 5 of 6
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 2 of 6
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 0 of 0
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 0 of 0

Significant Findings Kinematic Neck Assessment:

5. Kinematic Shoulder Assessment

A computer kinematic assessment is performed for shoulder flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, internal and external rotation. The Examinee is asked to perform each maneuver 8-10 repetitions to full range and as quickly as possible. The events were video taped in a precisely calibrated field for computer analysis. Each event is analyzed for total dynamic range of motion and peak velocity quantity and quality. Consistency of results is considered for determining Examinee effort. After a thorough discussion of expectations, and agreement of understanding by the Examinee, the Examinee is asked to perform the movement events.

More information...

Shoulder Flexion/Extension

Picture 8: LeftShoulder Flexion -
Picture 9: LeftShoulder Extension -
Picture 10: RightShoulder Flexion -
Picture 11: RightShoulder Extension -
Chart 4: Shoulder Flexion/Extension
Table 4: Shoulder Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 180 -50 180 -50
Examinee Sample (mean) 124.2 -21.9 116.2 -17.7
Standard Deviation (sd) 5.77 4.64 3.76 2.94
Range of Motion (rom) 146.1 146.1 133.9 133.9
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 3.9% 3.2% 2.8% 2.2%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 10 9 7 7
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Reject Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Accept
Probability (p1) 0.00156 0.02122 0.00156 0.02122

Shoulder Abduction/Adduction

Picture 12: LeftShoulder Abduction -
Picture 13: RightShoulder Abduction -
Chart 5: Shoulder Abduction/Adduction
Table 5: Shoulder Abduction/Adduction [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
Ab+
Left
Ad-
Left
Ab+
Right
Ad-
Right
Norm (mean) 180 -50 180 -50
Examinee Sample (mean) 144.4 30.9 143.1 24.6
Standard Deviation (sd) 5.42 1.65 6.87 .99
Range of Motion (rom) 113.6 113.6 118.5 118.5
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 4.8% 1.5% 5.8% .8%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 12 12 11 11
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Reject Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Reject Accept Accept
Probability (p1) 0.29176 0.00000 0.29176 0.00000

Shoulder Internal/External Rotation

Picture 14: LeftShoulder Internal Rotation -
Picture 15: LeftShoulder External Rotation -
Picture 16: RightShoulder Internal Rotation -
Picture 17: RightShoulder External Rotation -
Chart 6: Shoulder Internal/External Rotation
Table 6: Shoulder Internal/External Rotation (I/R) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
I+
Left
E-
Left
I+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 90 -90 90 -90
Examinee Sample (mean) 52.4 -87 56.3 -92.7
Standard Deviation (sd) 3.82 8.08 5.52 5.75
Range of Motion (rom) 139.4 139.4 149.1 149.1
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 2.7% 5.8% 3.7% 3.9%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 11 11 10 11
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Accept Reject Accept
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.11461 0.00000 0.06460
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Accept Accept
Probability (p1) 0.02816 0.02969 0.02816 0.02969
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 10 of 12
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 2 of 12
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 1 of 6
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 1 of 6

Significant Findings Kinematic Shoulder Assessment:

6. Kinematic Elbow Assessment

A computer kinematic assessment is performed for elbow flexion/extension, and forearm supination/pronation. The Examinee is asked to perform each maneuver 8-10 repetitions to full range and as quickly as possible. The events are video taped in a precisely calibrated field for computer analysis. Each event is analyzed for total dynamic range of motion and peak velocity quantity and quality. Consistency of results is considered for determining Examinee effort. After a thorough discussion of expectations, and agreement of understanding by the Examinee, the Examinee is asked to perform the movement events.

More information...
Picture 18: LeftElbow Flexion -
Picture 19: LeftElbow Extension -
Picture 20: RightElbow Flexion -
Picture 21: RightElbow Extension -
Chart 7: Elbow Flexion/Extension
Table 7: Elbow Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 140 0 140 0
Examinee Sample (mean) 152.7 50.6 146.7 10.6
Standard Deviation (sd) 5.13 4.7 3.42 1.66
Range of Motion (rom) 102.1 102.1 136.2 136.2
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 5% 4.6% 2.5% 1.2%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 9 8 8 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Accept Reject Accept Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00001 0.00000 0.00018 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Reject Reject Accept
Probability (p1) 0.00459 0.00000 0.00459 0.00000
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 2 of 4
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 2 of 4
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 1 of 2
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 1 of 2

Significant Findings Kinematic Elbow Assessment:

7. Kinematic Wrist Assessment

A computer kinematic assessment is performed for wrist flexion/extension, ulnar/radial deviation and supination/pronation. The Examinee is asked to perform each maneuver 8-10 repetitions to full range and as quickly as possible. The events are video taped in a precisely calibrated field for computer analysis. Each event is analyzed for total dynamic range of motion and peak velocity quantity and quality. Consistency of results is considered for determining Examinee effort. After a thorough discussion of expectations, and agreement of understanding by the Examinee, the Examinee is asked to perform the movement events.

More information...

Wrist Flexion/Extension

Picture 22: LeftWrist Flexion -
Picture 23: LeftWrist Extension -
Picture 24: RightWrist Flexion -
Picture 25: RightWrist Extension -
Chart 8: Wrist Flexion/Extension
Table 8: Wrist Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 60 -60 60 -60
Examinee Sample (mean) 78.1 -44.9 57.3 -21.6
Standard Deviation (sd) 1.18 1.68 2.44 4.24
Range of Motion (rom) 123 123 78.9 78.9
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 1% 1.4% 3.1% 5.4%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 7 7 6 6
H0: Examinee = Norm Accept Reject Accept Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00000 0.01326 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

Wrist Ulnar/Radial Deviation

Picture 26: LeftWrist Ulnar Deviation -
Picture 27: LeftWrist Radial Deviation -
Picture 28: RightWrist Ulnar Deviation -
Picture 29: RightWrist Radial Deviation -
Chart 9: Wrist Ulnar/Radial Deviation
Table 9: Wrist Ulnar/Radial Deviation (U/R) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
U+
Left
R-
Left
U+
Right
R-
Right
Norm (mean) 30 -20 30 -20
Examinee Sample (mean) 40.6 -22.3 25.4 -2.3
Standard Deviation (sd) 3.4 3.56 2.54 2.94
Range of Motion (rom) 62.9 62.9 27.6 27.6
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 5.4% 5.7% 9.2% 10.6%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 10 11 9 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.02198 0.00014 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

Forearm Supination/Pronation

Picture 30: LeftForearm Supination -
Picture 31: RightForearm Supination -
Picture 32: LeftForearm Pronation -
Picture 33: RightForearm Pronation -
Chart 10: Forearm Supination/Pronation
Table 10: Forearm Supination/Pronation (S/P) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
S+
Left
P-
Left
S+
Right
P-
Right
Norm (mean) 80 -80 80 -80
Examinee Sample (mean) 96.7 -86.2 85.7 -82.9
Standard Deviation (sd) 8.47 1.66 8.86 2.54
Range of Motion (rom) 182.9 182.9 168.6 168.6
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 4.6% .9% 5.3% 1.5%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 9 10 8 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Accept Accept Accept Accept
Probability (p0) 0.00008 0.00000 0.04577 0.00460
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00639 0.00135 0.00639 0.00135
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 4 of 12
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 6 of 12
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 0 of 6
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 6 of 6

Significant Findings Kinematic Wrist Assessment:

8. Kinematic Finger Assessment

A computer kinematic assessment is performed for index finger flexion/extension. The Examinee is asked to perform each maneuver 8-10 repetitions to full range and as quickly as possible. The events are video taped in a precisely calibrated field for computer analysis. Each event is analyzed for total dynamic range of motion and peak velocity quantity and quality. Consistency of results is considered for determining Examinee effort. After a thorough discussion of expectations, and agreement of understanding by the Examinee, the Examinee is asked to perform the movement events.

More information...
Picture 34: LeftFinger Flexion -
Picture 35: LeftFinger Extension -
Picture 36: RightFinger Flexion -
Picture 37: RightFinger Extension -
Chart 11: Finger MP Flexion/Extension
Table 11: Finger MP Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 80 0 80 0
Examinee Sample (mean) 67.9 -5.4 41.9 7.6
Standard Deviation (sd) 1.55 2.24 10.83 1.95
Range of Motion (rom) 73.3 73.3 34.3 34.3
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 2.1% 3.1% 31.6% 5.7%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 9 8 7 6
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00004 0.00001 0.00002
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Chart 12: Finger PIP Flexion/Extension
Table 12: Finger PIP Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 80 0 80 0
Examinee Sample (mean) 101.8 -8.5 102.7 -.5
Standard Deviation (sd) 9.8 1.37 1.09 1.27
Range of Motion (rom) 110.4 110.4 103.2 103.2
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 8.9% 1.2% 1.1% 1.2%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 9 9 7 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Accept Accept Accept Accept
Probability (p0) 0.00003 0.00000 0.00000 0.12502
Level of Confidence 95% 95% 95% 95%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Accept Reject
Probability (p1) 0.40417 0.00000 0.40417 0.00000
Chart 13: Finger DIP Flexion/Extension
Table 13: Finger DIP Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 80 0 80 0
Examinee Sample (mean) 67.8 6.7 59.8 10.3
Standard Deviation (sd) 4.06 1.75 1.77 1.19
Range of Motion (rom) 61.1 61.1 49.6 49.6
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 6.6% 2.9% 3.6% 2.4%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 9 9 7 8
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Reject Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Level of Confidence 95% 95% 95% 95%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00005 0.00004 0.00005 0.00004
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 7 of 12
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 5 of 12
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 0 of 6
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 5 of 6

Significant Findings Kinematic Finger Assessment:

9. Thumb Flexion/Extension

A computer kinematic assessment is performed for thumb flexion/extension. The Examinee is asked to perform each maneuver 8-10 repetitions to full range and as quickly as possible. The events are video taped in a precisely calibrated field for computer analysis. Each event is analyzed for total dynamic range of motion and peak velocity quantity and quality. Consistency of results is considered for determining Examinee effort. After a thorough discussion of expectations, and agreement of understanding by the Examinee, the Examinee is asked to perform the movement events.

More information...
Picture 38: LeftThumb Flexion -
Picture 39: LeftThumb Extension -
Picture 40: RightThumb Flexion -
Picture 41: RightThumb Extension -
Chart 14: Thumb MP Flexion/Extension
Table 14: Thumb MP Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 70 0 70 0
Examinee Sample (mean) 72 -5.3 47.9 31.2
Standard Deviation (sd) 1.86 3.52 .85 2.54
Range of Motion (rom) 77.3 77.3 16.7 16.7
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 2.4% 4.6% 5.1% 15.2%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 11 11 6 5
H0: Examinee = Norm Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p0) 0.00158 0.00015 0.00000 0.00000
Level of Confidence 99% 99% 99% 99%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Reject
Probability (p1) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Chart 15: Thumb IP Flexion/Extension
Table 15: Thumb IP Flexion/Extension (F/E) [ Help ]
Range of Motion
[degrees]
F+
Left
E-
Left
F+
Right
E-
Right
Norm (mean) 80 0 80 0
Examinee Sample (mean) 44.7 -14.1 35.9 -13.4
Standard Deviation (sd) 12.42 2.15 2.96 3.71
Range of Motion (rom) 58.8 58.8 49.3 49.3
Trial Consistency (sd/rom) 21.1% 3.7% 6% 7.5%
Degrees of Freedom (df) 11 11 6 5
H0: Examinee = Norm Reject Accept Reject Accept
Probability (p0) 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00015
Level of Confidence 95% 95% 95% 95%
H1: Side = Opposing Side Accept Accept Reject Accept
Probability (p1) 0.04321 0.30523 0.04321 0.30523
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 4 of 8
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 3 of 8
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 0 of 4
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 3 of 4

Significant Findings Thumb Flexion/Extension:

  • Number of tests where Examinee performed subnormal: 32 of 54
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed asymmetrically (one side worse than the other): 20 of 54
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Left Side than on Right Side: 2 of 24
  • Number of tests where Examinee performed worse on Right Side than on Left Side: 16 of 24

Significant Findings Ariel Kinematics Functional Capacity Evaluation:

10. Conclusions and Recommendations

Conclusions
Date:
Name:
Title:
Reference:
Conclusions:
Recommendations:
Independently verified by
Date:
Name:
Title:
Reference:
Comments:
Reference: /wizard/product/reports/sample005/pda.html
Downloads - more...

Downloads.

Sample PDA

Home
APAS
  • Introduction
  • Features
  • Advantages
  • Gallery
  • Downloads
  • References
More...
ACES
  • Introduction
  • Features
  • Advantages
  • Exercises
  • References
  • Gallery
More...
Products
  • Downloads
  • Price List
  • Price List Academic
Library
  • Applications
  • Articles
  • Downloads
  • Journals
  • Presentations
  • Videos
More...
Company
  • About
  • Activities
  • Contact
  • Founder
  • History
  • Presentations
More...
Help
  • FAQ
  • KB
  • Tutorials
Personal
  • Books
  • Photo Galleries
Administration

Copyright © 1994 - 2025. Ariel Dynamics Inc. All rights reserved.
Generated on 6/3/2025 5:52:13 PM (PST) ADI/HQ/GBA/2025/ARIELCLOUD/v3.1.2022.1031.